Skip to main content

Pricing built from an evidenced scope

Grow your company, not your bill.

Growth in your team and company should not automatically become an inflated system bill. Pricing is built around the real operating need and required scope. After diagnosis, you receive written scope, declared assumptions, and a price tied to them.

An offer can include unlimited named internal users without per-seat fees, subject to scope, infrastructure, service tier, and fair use.

Concept illustration — not a quote or fixed-fee promise

Traditional per-seat pricing

Every new hire raises the license bill

GizaLink company-level pricing

Seats may not drive price; scope, infrastructure, and service remain contractual

Four principal price drivers

The goal is not to sell the largest package; it is to remove ambiguity that creates expensive change later. A proposal fixes these scope inputs:

  • Operating scope: departments, branches, workflows, and required approvals.
  • Data and migration: volume, quality, cleansing, reconciliation, and parallel run.
  • Integrations: external systems, ownership, interfaces, and failure paths.
  • Deployment and service: hosting, capacity, support, training, and responsibilities.

As your company grows, your system grows with you.

You are not building only for today’s needs. You are building the foundation for what your company will become. The patterns below only start the conversation; nothing is available or included unless it is explicitly stated in the proposal and engagement acceptance.

  • Core operating scope

    One connected priority process

    • Analysis and target blueprint
    • Workflow and permissions
    • Agreed data migration
    • Defined training and operating acceptance
  • Connected operating scope

    More than one function or system

    • Everything evidenced in core scope
    • Named integrations with interface contracts
    • Error reconciliation and monitoring
    • Risk-based phased launch
  • Extended enterprise scope

    Broader branches, operations, and governance

    • Wider process and data map
    • Multi-stage migration and testing
    • Extended deployment and access controls
    • Agreed adoption and improvement plan

There are no final prices hidden behind these cards; price does not exist before scope. The proposal states price, exclusions, and the change mechanism clearly.

Compare the full decision cost, not the subscription alone

Total value includes implementation, migration, integrations, training, operation, and risk—not only a software licence. We claim no saving or lower price without your data and a like-for-like comparison.

  • Current systems and duplicate entry
  • Team time spent reconciling and working manually
  • Migration, interruption, and risk
  • Change and support after go-live
Use the calculator as a discussion input, not a quote

Questions to resolve before a proposal

Is pricing per user?

Pricing can be company-level and can include unlimited named internal users without per-seat fees, but only the written proposal establishes this, subject to scope, infrastructure, service tier, and fair use.

Why not publish one fixed price?

The number of processes and branches, data quality, integrations, and deployment model materially change effort and risk. A single number before diagnosis would be less transparent than written scope.

Are migration and training included?

An offer can include analysis, migration, training, and go-live support. The contract defines data, stages, responsibilities, and acceptance instead of implying unlimited inclusion.

Review the migration method
Are integrations included?

Only named integrations enter scope, after interfaces, authority, and ownership are verified. Any external change or new integration follows the declared change process.

What follows the diagnostic session?

You receive a summary of the problem, priority process, involved systems, open questions, and next step. Where there is fit, work moves to analysis, scope, and a written proposal; the session is not an undefined delivery promise.

Defensible pricing starts with testable scope

Share the highest-impact process and current systems; we will identify what must be understood before a comparable proposal can be built.